The Benchmark
Median Fintech M&A Multiples by Sub-Sector
Fintech does not price as one market. The spread between the cheapest and most expensive sub-sector below is more than five turns of revenue — and it is persistent, not cyclical.
| Sub-sector | Median EV/Revenue | Range | Deals (n) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regtech, compliance and open banking | 19.6x | 8.8x–50.0x | 3 |
| Banking and payments infrastructure | 15.7x | 12.0x–25.0x | 3 |
| Capital markets and mortgage technology | 11.6x | 7.6x–17.8x | 4 |
| Payments processing | 3.8x | 2.4x–4.7x | 3 |
| All disclosed transactions | 11.0x | 2.4x–50.0x | 19 |
| Lending and BNPL | Suppressed — fewer than 3 disclosed multiples. | ||
| Insurtech | Suppressed — fewer than 3 disclosed multiples. | ||
| Wealthtech | Suppressed — fewer than 3 disclosed multiples. | ||
Any cell with fewer than 3 observations is suppressed rather than reported. EV/EBITDA is not reported as a benchmark row: EBITDA was publicly disclosed in only 2 of the 240+ transactions in the Index (Adenza at 31x, Vertafore at 18.4x). Fintech M&A prices on revenue.
The Deals Behind the Medians
The Disclosed Record
A median is only as defensible as the deals beneath it. Every figure carries its public source.
| Transaction | Announced | Sub-sector | EV ($M) | Rev ($M) | EV/Rev | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visa / Tink | 2021-06 | Regtech & open banking | 2,150 | 43 | 50.0x | source |
| Block / Afterpay | 2021-08 | Lending & BNPL | 29,000 | 925 | 42.0x | source |
| Bill.com / Divvy | 2021-05 | Banking & payments infra. | 2,500 | 100 | 25.0x | source |
| Nasdaq / Verafin | 2020-11 | Regtech & open banking | 2,750 | 140 | 19.6x | source |
| Nasdaq / Adenza | 2023-06 | Capital markets & mortgage tech | 10,500 | 590 | 17.8x | source |
| SoFi / Technisys | 2022-02 | Banking & payments infra. | 1,100 | 70 | 15.7x | source |
| Rocket / Truebill | 2021-02 | Financial data & open banking | 1,275 | 100 | 12.8x | source |
| ICE / Ellie Mae | 2020-08 | Capital markets & mortgage tech | 11,000 | 900 | 12.2x | source |
| SoFi / Galileo | 2020-04 | Banking & payments infra. | 1,200 | 100 | 12.0x | source |
| FactSet / CUSIP | 2021-12 | Capital markets & mortgage tech | 1,925 | 175 | 11.0x | source |
| Roper / Vertafore | 2020-08 | Insurtech | 5,350 | 590 | 9.1x | source |
| Mastercard / Recorded Future | 2024-09 | Regtech & open banking | 2,650 | 300 | 8.8x | source |
| ICE / Black Knight | 2022-05 | Capital markets & mortgage tech | 11,800 | 1,550 | 7.6x | source |
| Thoma Bravo / Bottomline | 2022-01 | Treasury & cash management | 2,600 | 494 | 5.3x * | source |
| Nuvei / Paya | 2023-01 | Payments processing | 1,300 | 277 | 4.7x | source |
| Goldman Sachs / GreenSky | 2021-09 | Lending & BNPL | 2,240 | 526 | 4.3x | source |
| GTCR / Worldpay | 2023-07 | Payments processing | 18,500 | 4,900 | 3.8x | source |
| NEC / Avaloq | 2020-10 | Financial data & open banking | 2,200 | 660 | 3.4x | source |
| Nuvei / Payoneer | 2026-06 | Payments processing | 2,300 | 978 | 2.4x * | source |
Enterprise values and revenue as publicly reported at announcement. * Computed from annualized quarterly disclosure or reported terms of a transaction in progress; flagged in the Index. Download the comps set (CSV) ›
By Transaction Size
Multiples by Transaction Size Band
Size does not price linearly. The mid-band carries the lowest median because it holds the broadest mix of business models, while the largest transactions are dominated by software and exchange-grade infrastructure that prices on quality, not scale.
| Announced enterprise value | Median EV/Revenue | Range | Deals (n) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under $1.5 billion | 12.4x | 4.7x–15.7x | 4 |
| $1.5 billion to $3 billion | 8.8x | 2.4x–50.0x | 9 |
| Above $3 billion | 10.7x | 3.8x–42.0x | 6 |
Bands reflect announced enterprise value at the time of the transaction. Transactions below roughly $1 billion rarely disclose terms, so no band below $1.5 billion clears the 3-observation floor. A disclosed multiple is the exception in fintech M&A: 41% of tracked transactions disclose a value and 8% disclose enough to compute a multiple. Private lower-middle-market transactions generally clear several turns below these headline comps — which is precisely why a founder should not price a process from public comps alone.
What Drives the Range
Four Findings From the Disclosed Record
- The market repriced and stayed repriced. The median disclosed multiple fell from 12.1x across 2020–2021 to 7.6x on transactions announced since 2022. No recovery to peak, only stabilization.
- Software economics command the premium. Payments processing cleared a median of 3.8x while banking and payments infrastructure cleared 15.7x. Buyers pay for recurring, capital-light software revenue, not transaction volume.
- The outliers were scarcity purchases. Tink at a reported 50x and Afterpay at 42x were strategic buyers paying for a capability that could not be bought twice. Neither is a benchmark for an ordinary process.
- Strategic buyers set the clearing price. 98% of tracked transactions went to strategic or PE-backed strategic acquirers. A process that does not reach the strategic buyer pool is leaving the premium on the table.
Estimated Ranges
Where a Founder-Led Fintech Company Prices
The computed benchmark reports only what was publicly disclosed, and disclosure skews to transactions above $1 billion. For the lower middle market, Windsor Drake publishes the following advisory estimates — reconciling disclosed comps with published market benchmarks and the firm's process experience, stated as ranges because false precision serves no one.
| Sub-sector | Est. EV/Revenue | Est. EV/EBITDA | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Banking and payments infrastructure | 6x–12x | n/m | Comps, market benchmarks |
| Regtech and compliance | 5x–10x | n/m | Comps, market benchmarks |
| Capital markets and wealth technology | 5x–10x | n/m | Comps, market benchmarks |
| Wealthtech platforms | 4x–8x | n/m | Market benchmarks |
| Insurtech (software & MGA platforms) | 3x–7x | n/m | Comps, market benchmarks |
| Payments processing | 2.5x–5x | 8x–12x | Comps, market benchmarks |
| Lending and BNPL (capital-light) | 1.5x–4x | 6x–10x | Comps, market benchmarks |
Advisory estimates for founder-led, lower-middle-market companies, stated as ranges deliberately. n/m: no defensible basis; nothing is published without one. These are estimates, not computed medians; the computed benchmark above contains only sourced, disclosed figures.
A benchmark tells you where the market cleared, not where your company will. Within every sub-sector the multiple moves with revenue quality: recurring share, retention, capital intensity, and regulatory standing. The right use of this page is as a ceiling check and a sub-sector map. A credible number for your company comes from current private comparables and a read on which strategic buyers are active in your category this quarter.
Considering a sale?
Windsor Drake runs confidential, competitive sale processes for founder-led companies. Request a confidential, no-obligation read on where your company would price and which buyers are active.
Request a confidential valuation › Speak with an advisorMethodology
How the Benchmark Is Built
- Source. The Windsor Drake Fintech Exit Index — a hand-curated record of 240+ fintech M&A transactions (Jan 2020–Jun 2026) across 23 sub-sectors. Every row carries a public source: company announcement, regulatory filing, or credible trade press.
- Inclusion. Control transactions in fintech operating companies. SPAC mergers, bank charter acquisitions, insurance agency roll-ups, minority stakes, and duplicates are excluded from multiple computation.
- Definition. EV/Revenue is announced enterprise value over last-twelve-month or current-year revenue as publicly reported at announcement. Computed only where both figures are public: 19 of the 240+ transactions qualify.
- Suppression. Any cell with fewer than 3 observations is suppressed rather than reported.
- Two tiers, never mixed. The computed benchmark contains only sourced, disclosed figures. The estimated ranges are advisory and always labeled as estimates. The full comps set is downloadable as CSV.
- Refresh. Quarterly, updated in place at this URL. The underlying deal record is published in the Windsor Drake Market Intelligence transaction database.
Frequently Asked Questions
Fintech M&A Multiples: Common Questions
What is the average revenue multiple for a fintech company?
The median disclosed multiple is 11.0x EV/Revenue, across transactions announced January 2020 through June 2026. The dispersion matters more than the midpoint: payments processors cleared a median of 3.8x while regtech and open banking platforms cleared 19.6x.
How much does a fintech company sell for?
Across disclosed fintech M&A transactions from 2020 to 2026, the median valuation was 11.0x EV/Revenue, in a range of 2.4x to 50.0x. Where a company lands depends on sub-sector and revenue quality: payments processing cleared a median of 3.8x while banking and payments infrastructure cleared 15.7x. Private lower-middle-market transactions generally clear several turns below these headline public comps.
What multiple should a payments company expect in a sale?
Disclosed payments processing transactions cleared a median of 3.8x EV/Revenue (2.4x–4.7x). Companies selling payments software rather than processing volume price higher: banking and payments infrastructure cleared a median of 15.7x. The market pays for software economics, not volume.
Why are EBITDA multiples rarely quoted in fintech M&A?
Because almost nobody discloses them. EBITDA was public in only 2 of the 240+ transactions tracked (Adenza at 31x, Vertafore at 18.4x). Revenue is the pricing convention in fintech M&A.
Have fintech M&A multiples recovered to 2021 levels?
No. The median was 12.1x across 2020–2021 and 7.6x on transactions announced since the start of 2022. The market repriced and stayed repriced. Sellers anchored to a 2021 comparable are the most common reason a process stalls.
Do smaller fintech companies sell for lower multiples?
Deals under roughly $1 billion in enterprise value rarely disclose terms, so published multiples skew to large transactions. In Windsor Drake's experience, private lower-middle-market fintech transactions generally clear several turns below the headline comps, with sub-sector and revenue model driving the gap.
Who buys fintech companies?
Strategic acquirers dominate: 98% of transactions in the Index were strategic or PE-backed strategic buyers, against 2% pure financial sponsors. The clearing price is set by strategics buying capability, licensing, or distribution they would otherwise build.



