Home / Selected Transactions / Project Cedar
Selected Transaction · B2B SaaS

A supply-chain software company, sold past a concentration discount

One customer was forty percent of revenue, and the first buyer used it to justify a low multiple and a heavy holdback. Reframing the risk and creating competition closed it at $30M to $35M.

Request a Confidential Valuation
40%
Revenue in one account, repriced from liability to asset
$30M–$35M
Final consideration
9 yrs
Renewal history that anchored the case
Transaction summary
Sector
B2B SaaS · Supply-Chain Software
Enterprise value
$30M – $35M
Structure
Cash at close, normal-course holdback
Process
Competitive process, multiple parties under NDA
How the concentration account was priced
First buyer's view
≈30% lower, with clawback
Final close
$30M–$35M, normal holdback
The first offer applied a concentration discount of roughly a third. A competitive process that explained the account's stickiness erased it.
The engagement

The situation

Forty percent of revenue ran through a single customer, a relationship the founder had personally held for nine years. The first buyer treated that as the whole story: a discounted multiple, a large indemnity holdback tied to the account, and language that let it claw back value if the contract churned. The concentration was real, but it was being priced as a liability rather than understood.

What we did

Before going to market we built the case the founder had never had to make, a nine-year renewal history, expanding seat count, deep workflow integration, and switching costs measured in quarters rather than weeks. We documented the rest of the base, which was growing faster than the headline account, and put the relationship's economics in front of buyers rather than letting them imagine the downside. Then we ran a competitive process so no single buyer's view of the risk went unchallenged.

The outcome

Buyers who understood the stickiness bid against buyers who feared the churn, and the fear lost. The company closed at $30M to $35M with a normal-course holdback rather than a concentration-specific clawback. Concentration is a discount only when it is left unexplained.

“Everyone saw one big customer and got nervous. No one had ever shown them why that customer never leaves.”
Founder · representative
How the process ran
Engagement
Retained after a first buyer priced the concentration as a liability.
Preparation
Built a nine-year renewal, expansion, and switching-cost record for the key account.
Positioning
Showed the faster-growing remainder of the base alongside the anchor relationship.
Process
Ran competitive bids so no single buyer's risk view went untested.
Close
$30M to $35M, with a normal-course holdback rather than a concentration clawback.
What this transaction shows

Customer concentration is a discount only when it is left unexplained. Documented, defended, and put in competition, a sticky anchor account can be the most valuable thing in the business.

Details that could identify the company have been altered or withheld. Transaction details are representative of engagements of this type. Quotes are representative. References available to qualified parties under non-disclosure agreement.

Considering a sale of your company?

Request a confidential, no-obligation read on where your business would price today and which buyers are active in your market. Every inquiry is strictly confidential.

Market Intelligence

Latest Windsor Drake research

All research →
AI in Cybersecurity Valuations: Q2 2026Read the report →HR & Workforce SaaS Valuations: Q2 2026Read the report →AI Workflow Automation Valuations: Q2 2026Read the report →