Home / Selected Transactions / Project Harbor
Selected Transaction · Artificial Intelligence

An AI data-infrastructure founder who sold the majority and kept building

The founder wanted real liquidity but was years from done. A process built for partner fit, not just price, recapitalized the company at $50M to $70M with meaningful rollover.

Request a Confidential Valuation
$50M–$70M
Enterprise value at recapitalization
Majority
Stake sold, founder control retained
Rollover
Meaningful equity into the next phase
Transaction summary
Sector
Artificial Intelligence · Data Infrastructure
Enterprise value
$50M – $70M
Structure
Majority recapitalization, founder rollover and control retained
Process
Sponsors screened on fit and terms, not price alone
Why the highest bid did not win
Top headline bid
Highest check
Partner chosen
Better terms, right partner
On a recapitalization the partner you keep matters more than the number on the first page. The founder took roughly a turn less for the right one.
The engagement

The situation

The founder had built something with years of growth still ahead, but most of his net worth was locked in the company and he had never taken a dollar off the table. A full sale was wrong, because he was not done. A simple minority round would not give him the liquidity he needed. He needed a partner who would buy a majority, let him keep running and keep meaningful ownership, and back the next phase rather than strip it for margin.

What we did

We ran a process built for fit, not just price. Sponsors were screened on how they treat founders who stay, their posture on reinvestment versus cost-cutting, and the terms of the equity the founder would roll. Price mattered, but a recapitalization is a marriage, and the wrong high bid is worse than the right one a turn lower.

The outcome

The company recapitalized at $50M to $70M with a growth-equity partner. The founder took substantial liquidity, rolled meaningful equity into the next phase, and kept operational control. The best outcome was not the largest check. It was the partner who made the second bite worth more than the first.

“I wasn't selling the company. I was choosing who I would build the next five years with.”
Founder · representative
How the process ran
Engagement
Retained to find liquidity without a full exit.
Mandate
A majority recapitalization that kept the founder in control and invested.
Screening
Sponsors assessed on founder treatment, reinvestment posture, and rollover terms, not price alone.
Negotiation
Rollover equity and governance shaped before the final price was set.
Close
$50M to $70M recapitalization with substantial liquidity and meaningful rollover.
What this transaction shows

A recapitalization is a partnership, not an exit. The highest bid can be the wrong one when the founder is staying; the terms of the equity you roll and the partner you keep decide the second bite.

Details that could identify the company have been altered or withheld. Transaction details are representative of engagements of this type. Quotes are representative. References available to qualified parties under non-disclosure agreement.

Considering a sale of your company?

Request a confidential, no-obligation read on where your business would price today and which buyers are active in your market. Every inquiry is strictly confidential.

Market Intelligence

Latest Windsor Drake research

All research →
AI in Cybersecurity Valuations: Q2 2026Read the report →HR & Workforce SaaS Valuations: Q2 2026Read the report →AI Workflow Automation Valuations: Q2 2026Read the report →