The short answer

Houlihan Lokey and Moelis & Company are both large, public, independent advisory firms, and that is where the resemblance ends. Houlihan Lokey is a volume franchise built around the mid-cap: 339 managing directors, a stated majority of engagements in mid-cap transactions, and the No. 1 ranking by number of deals. Moelis is a senior-advice house built by Ken Moelis in 2007, with 169 managing directors and no league tables in its investor materials at all, because count is not its argument. Which one fits depends on whether your transaction is one of hundreds like it this year, or one the firm will treat as an event.

What each firm says it is

Houlihan Lokey states its position bluntly. Per its fiscal 2025 10-K, a majority of its engagements relate to mid-cap transactions, a segment it calls underserved by bulge-bracket banks, and it describes itself as consistently selling more companies under $1 billion than any competitor. Its fiscal 2025 earnings release claims the No. 1 spot for all global M&A transactions for two consecutive years and the No. 1 U.S. M&A advisor for ten, by transaction count per LSEG, with 458 deals in 2025 against Goldman Sachs at 441. It also runs the No. 1 global restructuring franchise by count, eleven years running per the same source.

Moelis describes itself as a leading global independent investment bank providing innovative strategic advice. Its 10-K lists clients from large multinationals to middle market private companies and entrepreneurs, and notes that its top ten transactions produced roughly 19 percent of 2024 revenue, which tells you the shape of the business: fewer, larger, more episodic mandates. The firm publishes no league-table claims in the materials we reviewed. Revenue reached a record of roughly $1.54 billion in 2025, up 28 percent, against Houlihan Lokey’s $2.39 billion fiscal 2025.

Side by side, from their own filings

Houlihan Lokey Moelis & Company
Founded 1972 2007
Managing directors 339 (240 in corporate finance) 169
Employees 2,702 1,309
Offices 35 23 locations
Most recent annual revenue $2.39B (FY2025, ends March 31) ~$1.54B adjusted (2025, record)
Stated market focus Majority mid-cap engagements; more sub-$1B companies sold than any competitor (10-K) Clients from multinationals to middle market private companies and entrepreneurs (10-K)
League claims No. 1 global M&A by count, 2 years; No. 1 U.S., 10 years (LSEG, per firm) None published
Technology practice No. 1 global tech M&A by 2025 count per LSEG; ~150 tech professionals, 25+ MDs Technology listed among 13 sector groups
Restructuring No. 1 global by count, 11 years (LSEG, per firm) Restructuring among core services

All figures from each firm’s 10-K and earnings releases, cited below. Neither firm publishes fees or a minimum deal size, so any adviser who quotes you either firm’s “typical fee” is guessing.

How a founder should choose between them

If your company sits in the true mid-cap, roughly $300 million to $1 billion, Houlihan Lokey’s model was built for you: deep sector teams, a 150-person technology group, and a machine that runs hundreds of processes a year, which means the playbook for your situation already exists. The trade embedded in that volume is arithmetic. Four hundred fifty-eight LSEG-counted deals across 339 managing directors means the firm’s advantage is the system, and your outcome depends on which team inside it you get. Ask which MD runs your deal day to day and how many mandates that person is carrying, and get the answer in the engagement letter.

Moelis earns its fee in a different situation: a transaction with a strategic decision inside it, a complicated shareholder table, a restructuring overlay, or a board that wants a name in the room when the other side brings one. You are buying senior judgment applied to an unusual problem, not a repeatable process. The revenue concentration in its own filings says the firm is organized around exactly those mandates.

Where neither is the natural answer

Below roughly $300 million, the economics of a 1,300 to 2,700-person public firm work against senior attention, whatever the marketing says. Houlihan Lokey genuinely reaches further down-market than most large firms, its own 10-K says so, but a founder-led company at $20 million or $80 million is staffing math at any firm of that size. That segment belongs to specialist boutiques where the senior banker who pitched runs the process, which is the model we compare directly against Moelis here, and the criteria for choosing among boutiques are covered in what to look for before hiring an advisor.

Questions founders ask

Is Houlihan Lokey or Moelis better for selling a private company?

For mid-cap companies, roughly $300 million to $1 billion, Houlihan Lokey’s volume franchise and sector depth are built for the job, and its own filings state a mid-cap majority. Moelis fits transactions with a strategic or special-situations dimension where senior judgment matters more than process repetition. Below $300 million, both firms’ size works against senior attention, and specialist boutiques become the natural choice.

What do Houlihan Lokey and Moelis charge?

Neither firm publishes fees, retainers, or minimums anywhere, including their SEC filings. Any specific number you hear is anecdote, not schedule. Ask for the full fee structure in writing before signing, whatever firm you talk to.

Which firm is stronger in technology?

By published evidence, Houlihan Lokey: it claims the No. 1 global technology M&A ranking by 2025 deal count per LSEG, with roughly 150 dedicated technology professionals. Moelis lists technology among its 13 sector groups but publishes no comparable practice detail.

Sources. Houlihan Lokey FY2025 Form 10-K, FY2025 earnings release, M&A practice page and technology practice page (LSEG rankings as published by the firm). Moelis 2024 Form 10-K and Q4/FY2025 earnings release. League-table data is LSEG’s, as republished by Houlihan Lokey, a party to this comparison; treat count rankings accordingly.

Key Facts

  • Houlihan Lokey: No. 1 by global deal count per LSEG, 458 deals in 2025, majority mid-cap by its own 10-K.
  • Moelis: founded 2007, 169 MDs, no published league tables, top-10 transactions were ~19% of 2024 revenue.
  • Neither firm publishes fees or minimum deal sizes anywhere, including SEC filings.

About This Comparison

Windsor Drake is a boutique sell-side M&A advisory firm for founder-led technology companies in the $5M to $300M range, with offices in Toronto. Comparisons on this page are built from each firm’s own published materials and filings, cited at the end of the page.

Holding an Offer?

Independent sell-side M&A advisory for fintech founders. The firm represents founder-led companies in sell-side M&A from its Toronto headquarters.

Approach Response ›

Considering a sale?

Windsor Drake represents founders on the sell side only. Every inquiry is read and answered personally, usually within one business day, and every conversation is confidential and without obligation.

Discuss a potential sale

Windsor Drake is not a registered broker-dealer and does not offer, sell or place securities.