EBITDA Multiples by Industry (2026 Private-Company Data)

Updated 25 industries, three size bandsRanges as of August 2026Market data through Q3 2026Version 2026.10

Windsor Drake research. Reviewed by Jeff Barrington, Founder and Managing Director. United States and Canada, US dollars.

EBITDA multiple by industry

B2B SaaS (profitable)EV / LTM adjusted EBITDA, $3M to $10M

7.0x to 10.0x

Windsor Drake range, August 2026 · Trend: Firming · Confidence: Moderate

  • $1M to $3M5.5x to 8.0x
  • $3M to $10M7.0x to 10.0x
  • $10M+9.0x to 13.0x
Public comparable, EV / EBITDA
24.5xSoftware (System & Application), 309 firms
Primary metric
EV / LTM adjusted EBITDA; ARR multiples below breakeven
What moves it
Net revenue retention; gross margin; organic growth

See the row in the full table · Read the sector note

Ranges: Windsor Drake analyst judgment, August 2026, for private US and Canadian companies. Public comparable: NYU Stern, January 2026, positive-EBITDA firms.

Short answer

Private companies with $1 million to $10 million of LTM adjusted EBITDA mostly sell for 3.0x to 10.0x EBITDA, depending on industry and size (Windsor Drake ranges, August 2026). Private equity deals in the middle market averaged 7.0x in Q2 2026 across 85 completed transactions (GF Data). Owner-operated Main Street businesses sell on cash flow instead: 2.30x for businesses that sold for under $1 million and 3.73x above it in Q3 2026 (BizBuySell). US public companies traded at 19.7x EBITDA in January 2026 (NYU Stern).

By industry

2026 EBITDA multiples by industry and company size

Indicative enterprise value to LTM adjusted EBITDA ranges for private US and Canadian companies, in three bands of LTM adjusted EBITDA. Every range is Windsor Drake analyst judgment, informed by the cited deal datasets (GF Data, BizBuySell), public trading data (NYU Stern) and observed buyer behavior. It is not licensed row-level transaction data. Treat each cell as the starting range for a well-run competitive process, then adjust for the six driver groups.

25 industries

EV / LTM adjusted EBITDA, indicative ranges by EBITDA band, US and Canada, USD. Ranges as of August 2026; Windsor Drake analyst judgment.
Range by bandPremium and discount drivers
B2B SaaS (profitable)EV / LTM adjusted EBITDA; ARR multiples below breakeven. Moderate confidence5.5x to 8.0x7.0x to 10.0x9.0x to 13.0x24.5xSoftware (System & Application)FirmingNet revenue retention; gross margin; organic growth
Fintech and paymentsEV / LTM adjusted EBITDA; ARR or volume metrics before profit. Moderate confidence5.5x to 8.0x7.0x to 10.0x9.0x to 13.0xn/aFirmingRecurring and re-occurring revenue; regulatory posture; bank and network dependence
Cybersecurity services and MSSPsEV / LTM adjusted EBITDA. Moderate confidence5.0x to 7.0x6.5x to 9.0x8.5x to 12.0x14.1xComputer ServicesFirmingRecurring contract base; certifications and clearances; talent retention
IT services and MSPsEV / LTM adjusted EBITDA. Moderate confidence4.5x to 6.0x5.5x to 7.5x7.0x to 9.5x14.1xComputer ServicesFirmingMRR share; contract quality; technician bench
Healthcare IT and tech-enabled servicesEV / LTM adjusted EBITDA. Moderate confidence5.5x to 7.5x7.0x to 9.5x8.5x to 12.0x21.3xHealthcare Information and TechnologyFirmingPayer and provider stickiness; compliance moat; recurring share
Healthcare services (multi-site)EV / LTM adjusted EBITDA. Indicative confidence4.5x to 6.0x5.5x to 7.5x7.0x to 9.5x11.2xHealthcare Support ServicesStablePayer mix; clinician retention; de novo pipeline
Dental and veterinary practicesEV / LTM adjusted EBITDA; SDE below about $1M. Indicative confidence4.0x to 5.5x5.5x to 7.5x7.0x to 9.0xn/aStableAssociate-driven production; same-store growth; consolidator coverage
Home care and behavioral healthEV / LTM adjusted EBITDA. Indicative confidence4.0x to 5.5x5.0x to 7.0x6.5x to 8.5xn/aStableReimbursement exposure; caregiver supply; referral concentration
Business and professional servicesEV / LTM adjusted EBITDA. Indicative confidence4.0x to 5.5x5.0x to 7.0x6.5x to 8.5x14.3xBusiness & Consumer ServicesStableContract recurrence; partner dependence; client concentration
Accounting and tax firmsEV / LTM adjusted EBITDA; SDE for small practices. Indicative confidence3.5x to 5.0x4.5x to 6.5x6.0x to 8.0xn/aFirmingRecurring compliance revenue; partner transition risk; realization rates
Insurance agencies and brokeragesEV / LTM adjusted EBITDA. Indicative confidence5.5x to 7.5x7.0x to 9.5x8.5x to 12.0xn/aStableClient retention; carrier mix; producer age and equity
Marketing and digital agenciesEV / LTM adjusted EBITDA. Indicative confidence3.5x to 5.0x4.5x to 6.0x5.5x to 7.5x12.0xAdvertisingSofteningRetainer share; client concentration; AI substitution risk
Engineering and architectureEV / LTM adjusted EBITDA. Indicative confidence4.0x to 5.5x5.0x to 6.5x6.0x to 8.0x17.2xEngineering/ConstructionFirmingBacklog; licensed-staff depth; infrastructure mix
Staffing and recruitingEV / LTM adjusted EBITDA. Indicative confidence3.5x to 4.5x4.0x to 5.5x5.0x to 7.0xn/aSofteningContract versus permanent mix; gross margin; end-market cyclicality
Niche and precision manufacturingEV / LTM adjusted EBITDA. Indicative confidence4.0x to 5.5x5.0x to 7.0x6.5x to 8.5x16.2xMachineryFirmingProprietary process; customer concentration; capex intensity
Industrial products and automationEV / LTM adjusted EBITDA. Indicative confidence4.5x to 6.0x5.5x to 7.5x7.0x to 9.0x16.2xMachineryFirmingAftermarket share; engineering IP; reshoring demand
Building products manufacturingEV / LTM adjusted EBITDA. Indicative confidence4.0x to 5.5x5.0x to 6.5x6.0x to 8.0x11.6xBuilding MaterialsStableChannel mix; housing cycle; input-cost pass-through
Aerospace and defense suppliersEV / LTM adjusted EBITDA. Indicative confidence5.0x to 6.5x6.0x to 8.0x7.5x to 10.0x21.6xAerospace/DefenseFirmingPlatform exposure; certifications; sole-source share
Commercial and specialty constructionEV / LTM adjusted EBITDA. Indicative confidence3.0x to 4.5x4.0x to 5.5x5.0x to 7.0x17.2xEngineering/ConstructionStableBacklog quality; bonding capacity; recurring service mix
Home services (HVAC, plumbing, electrical)EV / LTM adjusted EBITDA. Indicative confidence4.0x to 5.5x5.5x to 7.5x7.0x to 10.0xn/aFirmingService-agreement base; technician pipeline; market density
Environmental and waste servicesEV / LTM adjusted EBITDA. Indicative confidence4.5x to 6.0x5.5x to 7.5x7.0x to 9.5x15.6xEnvironmental & Waste ServicesFirmingRoute density; permits and licenses; contract recurrence
Logistics, transportation and 3PLEV / LTM adjusted EBITDA. Indicative confidence3.5x to 5.0x4.5x to 6.0x5.5x to 7.5x12.6xTransportationStableAsset intensity; freight-cycle exposure; customer concentration
Distribution and wholesaleEV / LTM adjusted EBITDA. Indicative confidence4.0x to 5.5x5.0x to 6.5x6.0x to 8.0x13.7xRetail (Distributors)StableExclusive lines; working-capital needs; disintermediation risk
Food and beverage manufacturingEV / LTM adjusted EBITDA. Indicative confidence4.0x to 5.5x5.0x to 7.0x6.5x to 9.0x10.0xFood ProcessingStableBrand versus co-manufacturing; retailer concentration; food-safety record
Consumer products and e-commerceEV / LTM adjusted EBITDA. Indicative confidence3.0x to 4.5x4.0x to 5.5x5.0x to 7.0x13.2xHousehold ProductsStableChannel dependence; brand equity; tariff and supply exposure
$1M to $3M EBITDA$3M to $10M$10M+Scale 0x to 14x
  • How to read it. Columns are LTM adjusted EBITDA bands; cells are indicative enterprise value ranges expressed as multiples of that EBITDA. Enterprise value is cash-free and debt-free. Trend is the direction Windsor Drake observes against 2025, not a computed statistic.
  • Statistic and sample. No cell is a mean, median or interquartile range, and no observation counts are claimed. Moderate confidence marks the five technology sectors Windsor Drake covers with dedicated research; Indicative marks sectors benchmarked mainly from public sources.
  • Public comparable. The closest NYU Stern industry, January 2026, positive-EBITDA firms: listed companies trading as minority stakes, shown for context and never as a private price.
  • Smaller businesses. Below roughly $1M of earnings these EBITDA ranges do not apply. See Main Street benchmarks below.

Main Street and SDE benchmarks, kept separate on purpose

Small owner-operated businesses sell on seller’s discretionary earnings (SDE), not adjusted EBITDA. In Q3 2026, BizBuySell counted 2,132 closed small-business sales at a median sale price of $350,000. Businesses that sold for more than $1 million, 22% of transactions, averaged 3.73x cash flow and 0.97x revenue; businesses that sold for less averaged 2.30x and 0.62x. Those are broker-reported Main Street sales where the buyer usually replaces the owner. Do not compare them with the EV / EBITDA ranges above: the earnings base is different. The distinction is explained in SDE versus EBITDA.

Market tiers

Main Street vs. middle market vs. public: choose the correct benchmark first

Most “average EBITDA multiple” claims fail because they blend three different markets. Identify your tier before you benchmark anything: each uses a different earnings basis and a different data universe.

Three markets, three benchmarks
Market tierTypical companyEarnings basisCurrent benchmark (source, period, sample)What it measures
Main StreetOwner-operated; often under $5M of revenueSDE (cash flow)3.73x for sales above $1M and 2.30x below, average cash flow · BizBuySell Q3 2026 · 2,132 closed salesBroker-reported closed sales; the buyer usually replaces the owner
Private equity middle market$10M to $500M of enterprise valueTEV / TTM adjusted EBITDA7.0x average · GF Data Q2 2026 · 85 completed deals. First half 2026: 7.1x on 170 dealsCompleted platform and add-on control deals reported by contributing PE firms
Public companiesListed, liquid, professionally managedEV / EBITDA19.7x aggregate, positive-EBITDA firms · NYU Stern January 2026 · 5,994 US firmsTrading levels for minority shares, not control-sale pricing

GF Data counts deals in its standard $10M to $500M cohort; its database covers $1M to $500M. BizBuySell groups sales by sale price. NYU Stern’s figure is an aggregate ratio across listed firms, not an average of deals.

Company size

The company-size effect, from sourced data

Size is one of the strongest observed pricing variables, though not the only one. GF Data’s small-deal analysis for the first half of 2025, covering 118 deals under $25M of enterprise value, shows the pattern; its size-band data for the first nine months of 2025 shows it continuing up the market. These are enterprise value (TEV) brackets, not EBITDA bands, so keep the two segmentations apart.

Average TEV / TTM adjusted EBITDA by deal size
TEV bracketAverageSource and period
$1M to $5M TEVabout 5.5xGF Data, H1 2025 (118 deals under $25M of TEV)
$5M to $10M TEVabout 5.6xGF Data, H1 2025 (118 deals under $25M of TEV)
$10M to $25M TEV6.2x to 6.7xGF Data, H1 2025 (118 deals under $25M of TEV)
All deals, standard cohort7.0xGF Data, Q2 2026 (85 completed deals); 7.1x in the first half (170 deals)

GF Data small-deal analysis, H1 2025; GF Data via ACG, Q2 2026; ACG, first half 2026.

Larger deals clear higher multiples

Average TEV / adjusted EBITDA by deal size, first nine months of 2025 (GF Data)

  • $10M to $25M5.9x
  • $25M to $50M6.6x
  • $50M to $100M8.7x
  • $100M to $250M10.0x

General lower-middle-market data across all sectors. Source.

GF Data describes the gap between deals under $10M and the $10M to $25M tier as “nearly a full turn” of EBITDA that persists across periods. In the second quarter of 2026, add-ons priced 1.2x above platforms, after platforms led by 1.1x in the first quarter (ACG). The mechanics are consistent: larger companies attract deeper buyer pools, cheaper and more available financing, and more professional operations, and buyers pay for the lower risk. That is why the table above splits every industry by EBITDA band rather than quoting one number per sector.

Public comps

Public company EV / EBITDA by industry, January 2026

Enterprise value to EBITDA for 94 US industries from Aswath Damodaran’s dataset at NYU Stern, data as of January 2026, the current edition. Listed companies trade as small, liquid minority stakes, so these multiples run far above private control deals: 19.7x for all firms with positive EBITDA against 7.0x for middle-market private equity deals in Q2 2026. Use them for sector sentiment and relative ranking, not as a private price. The twenty highest-multiple industries show first; search finds any of them. Banks and brokers show n/a because EBITDA does not apply to them.

Showing 20 of 94

US public companies, EV / EBITDA and EV / EBIT by industry, January 2026 (NYU Stern)
Advertising5212.0x20.9x15.1x
Aerospace/Defense7921.6x34.8x33.4x
Air Transport237.6x19.3x10.0x
Apparel3510.3x16.1x13.9x
Auto & Truck3347.8x160.3x51.9x
Auto Parts356.4x12.4x9.1x
Bank (Money Center)15n/an/an/a
Banks (Regional)568n/an/an/a
Beverage (Alcoholic)148.6x10.8x8.3x
Beverage (Soft)2716.9x20.1x18.2x
Broadcasting247.9x11.2x7.7x
Brokerage & Investment Banking32n/an/an/a
Building Materials4111.6x16.0x11.8x
Business & Consumer Services15514.3x20.2x16.2x
Cable TV96.2x11.3x6.4x
Chemical (Basic)298.6x29.0x6.9x
Chemical (Diversified)48.4x24.7x8.7x
Chemical (Specialty)5913.4x21.3x14.7x
Coal & Related Energy1610.4xn/a19.5x
Computer Services6414.1x19.3x16.5x
Computers/Peripherals3625.4x29.4x26.2x
Construction Supplies4016.8x21.2x16.6x
Diversified2011.4x13.5x9.9x
Drugs (Biotechnology)49615.8x69.0x51.5x
Drugs (Pharmaceutical)22815.3x20.3x18.6x
Education329.3x14.5x12.0x
Electrical Equipment11224.6x43.2x35.0x
Electronics (Consumer & Office)830.7xn/an/a
Electronics (General)11420.0x29.8x25.9x
Engineering/Construction4817.2x25.2x21.8x
Entertainment9219.4x38.9x24.4x
Environmental & Waste Services5315.6x24.8x17.6x
Farming/Agriculture3516.0x23.7x16.7x
Financial Svcs. (Non-bank & Insurance)17657.5x69.4x89.9x
Food Processing7810.0x13.6x9.6x
Food Wholesalers1311.1x17.9x12.3x
Furn/Home Furnishings2711.3x19.2x13.7x
Green & Renewable Energy1513.4x42.6x13.5x
Healthcare Products20419.8x30.0x23.4x
Healthcare Support Services10411.2x15.0x11.8x
Healthcare Information and Technology11521.3x34.8x25.9x
Homebuilding308.9x9.4x8.4x
Hospitals/Healthcare Facilities318.9x13.1x10.7x
Hotel/Gaming6314.9x25.7x17.7x
Household Products11013.2x16.3x13.7x
Information Services1511.5x17.8x12.8x
Insurance (General)2115.8x20.1x18.4x
Insurance (Life)2012.5x11.7x11.2x
Insurance (Prop/Cas.)578.4x9.6x10.1x
Investments & Asset Management28338.0x20.4x47.1x
Machinery10516.2x21.0x17.5x
Metals & Mining7311.4x15.7x13.7x
Office Equipment & Services148.6x13.0x10.0x
Oil/Gas (Integrated)48.2x15.2x8.1x
Oil/Gas (Production and Exploration)1425.2x10.3x6.2x
Oil/Gas Distribution2311.6x16.5x13.4x
Oilfield Svcs/Equip.978.6x14.9x9.6x
Packaging & Container199.7x15.8x10.8x
Paper/Forest Products68.2x15.5x7.0x
Power4612.4x21.9x13.3x
Precious Metals5610.7x14.3x17.3x
Publishing & Newspapers1911.2x17.2x12.9x
R.E.I.T.19019.9x42.7x24.3x
Real Estate (Development)1410.2x13.5x12.2x
Real Estate (General/Diversified)1217.3x26.9x25.1x
Real Estate (Operations & Services)5422.0x49.6x37.0x
Recreation4910.4x24.0x11.7x
Reinsurance18.7x9.0x10.9x
Restaurant/Dining6417.5x30.2x21.4x
Retail (Automotive)3414.8x21.7x17.6x
Retail (Building Supply)1414.4x19.1x15.9x
Retail (Distributors)6213.7x17.1x16.7x
Retail (General)2317.4x32.4x20.9x
Retail (Grocery and Food)158.9x26.5x9.1x
Retail (REITs)2616.7x31.2x17.9x
Retail (Special Lines)9411.5x20.0x16.5x
Rubber& Tires36.7x22.8x6.7x
Semiconductor6634.8x44.3x42.7x
Semiconductor Equip3124.7x28.8x26.2x
Shipbuilding & Marine88.0x12.8x8.5x
Shoe1116.9x22.3x17.2x
Software (Entertainment)7722.0x27.0x26.2x
Software (Internet)2930.3x173.0x100.5x
Software (System & Application)30924.5x32.4x31.8x
Steel1911.6x24.6x11.1x
Telecom (Wireless)129.0x18.8x10.8x
Telecom. Equipment5724.1x30.9x27.2x
Telecom. Services396.5x12.2x7.5x
Tobacco1013.5x14.6x15.2x
Transportation1912.6x21.5x16.7x
Transportation (Railroads)413.5x17.8x13.6x
Trucking2610.4x23.8x11.2x
Utility (General)1413.7x22.6x15.0x
Utility (Water)1414.1x21.1x15.7x
Total Market5,99419.7x29.1x24.0x
Total Market (without financials)4,82217.0x25.7x19.9x

Source: Aswath Damodaran, NYU Stern School of Business, Enterprise Value Multiples by Sector (US), data as of January 2026. EV / EBITDA and EV / EBIT use firms with positive EBITDA; the last column includes all firms. Aggregate ratios, not averages. Windsor Drake’s own public median study is in the August 2026 constituent report.

Europe and the UK

Public company EV / EBITDA by industry, Europe, January 2026

The same NYU Stern dataset has a European cut covering listed companies across Europe, including the UK, data as of January 2026. It is the public benchmark to use for EBITDA multiples by industry in Europe, and it reads very differently from the US table above: the European market as a whole prices at 10.7x EV / EBITDA against 19.7x in the US, a gap that reflects sector mix and the weight of US mega-cap technology as much as any pricing difference for comparable businesses. The industries below are the ones this page covers for private deals; the full file has 94.

European public companies, EV / EBITDA and EV / EBIT by industry, January 2026 (NYU Stern). Firms with positive EBITDA; aggregate ratios.
IndustryFirmsEV / EBITDAEV / EBIT
Software (system and application)29020.9x25.3x
Software (internet)239.3x17.5x
Computer services and IT services21012.0x14.9x
Healthcare information and technology8915.9x25.3x
Financial services (non-bank and insurance)14617.0x20.1x
Information services65.4x7.4x
Business and consumer services17612.8x17.5x
Healthcare products16317.0x24.8x
Healthcare support services4712.6x17.9x
Machinery21015.0x19.0x
Electrical equipment14618.9x24.3x
Engineering and construction1609.7x14.3x
Transportation5612.6x17.7x
Trucking79.1x16.7x
Food processing17312.4x16.4x
Restaurants and dining3812.1x16.2x
Retail (distributors)11711.6x15.2x
Telecom services627.2x13.7x
Insurance (general)348.1x7.6x
Total market, Europe6,56010.7x14.6x
Total market, Europe (without financials)5,75710.8x15.1x

Source: Aswath Damodaran, NYU Stern School of Business, Enterprise Value Multiples by Sector (Europe), data updated January 2026, spreadsheet download. Industry names follow the source file. Private European and UK transaction pricing is not in this dataset; for that, use the transaction databases in the data providers table and read the Canada, UK and Europe answer in the FAQ.

Industry notes

Priority industry notes for 2026

Ten sectors that founders ask about most. Each note states the metric that governs pricing, how size changes it, and the caveat buyers will raise. Ranges are the Windsor Drake bands from the table above, as of August 2026; GF Data sector averages are for deals of $10M to $500M of enterprise value in the first half of 2026.

B2B SaaS

$3M to $10M EBITDA: 7.0x to 10.0x · Trend: Firming

Profitable B2B SaaS is priced on EV / LTM adjusted EBITDA once EBITDA is real and durable; below breakeven, buyers switch to ARR and revenue metrics. Size moves the band sharply: 5.5x to 8.0x at $1M to $3M of EBITDA and 9.0x to 13.0x at $10M or more. Net revenue retention, gross margin and organic growth decide where a company lands inside any band; a shrinking SaaS business with 20% margins is not a premium asset whatever the category. Caveat: buyers re-cut EBITDA for capitalized development costs, so expect the metric itself to be negotiated. More in SaaS valuation multiples.

Fintech and payments

$3M to $10M EBITDA: 7.0x to 10.0x · Trend: Firming

Fintech runs on two pricing regimes. Profitable, compliance-mature platforms trade on EV / adjusted EBITDA, 7.0x to 10.0x at $3M to $10M of EBITDA, while pre-profit companies trade on ARR or processed-volume metrics. Payments businesses with contractual residual streams price toward the top of the band; see payments valuation benchmarks. Strategic acquirers and sponsors both pay for durable merchant or bank relationships, low attrition and a clean regulatory record. Caveat: revenue that depends on a single sponsor bank, processor or network agreement is discounted like customer concentration, sometimes more. Public and deal multiples by subsector are in fintech valuation multiples, and the fintech valuation calculator runs a first pass.

Cybersecurity services

$3M to $10M EBITDA: 6.5x to 9.0x · Trend: Firming

Managed security providers and MSSPs are priced on EV / LTM adjusted EBITDA: 6.5x to 9.0x at $3M to $10M of EBITDA and 8.5x to 12.0x above $10M. Recurring monitoring contracts, certifications and clearances, and scarce senior talent earn premiums; project-heavy penetration testing prices below contracted MDR and SOC revenue. Consolidators remain active, which supports the top of the range for platforms with proven retention. Caveat: buyers test tooling dependence, so a service book built on one vendor’s stack, or on a few certified people, is treated as risk rather than capability. More in the cybersecurity valuation report.

Healthcare IT and healthcare services

$3M to $10M EBITDA: 7.0x to 9.5x · Trend: Firming

Healthcare IT with recurring, compliance-embedded revenue carries 7.0x to 9.5x at $3M to $10M of EBITDA and 8.5x to 12.0x above $10M; multi-site healthcare services run lower, 5.5x to 7.5x in the middle band. GF Data recorded a 7.7x average for healthcare services deals in the first half of 2026 on a small sample. Both price on EV / LTM adjusted EBITDA, but the diligence lens differs: payer mix, reimbursement exposure and clinician retention for services; integration depth and switching costs for IT. Practices below roughly $1M of earnings price on SDE, covered for dental and veterinary practices separately. Caveat: reimbursement-rule changes can reprice a services platform in the middle of a process.

IT services and MSPs

$3M to $10M EBITDA: 5.5x to 7.5x · Trend: Firming

MSPs are priced on EV / LTM adjusted EBITDA: 4.5x to 6.0x at $1M to $3M of EBITDA, 5.5x to 7.5x at $3M to $10M and 7.0x to 9.5x above that. The share of true monthly recurring revenue under contract is the first question every buyer asks; seat and endpoint agreements with annual escalators support the top of the band, while time-and-materials work prices like project services. Private equity consolidators still account for most of the buyer demand. Caveat: technician retention and documented processes matter more than brand, and an MSP whose knowledge lives in two engineers’ heads will see it in the multiple.

Business and professional services

$3M to $10M EBITDA: 5.0x to 7.0x · Trend: Stable

Outsourced business services, such as testing, compliance, tech-enabled back office and facilities-adjacent work, price on EV / LTM adjusted EBITDA: 4.0x to 5.5x at $1M to $3M of EBITDA rising to 6.5x to 8.5x above $10M. GF Data recorded a 7.5x average for business services deals in its $10M to $500M cohort in the first half of 2026. Contract recurrence and switching costs separate the winners: multi-year contracted revenue with embedded workflows prices well above relationship-driven work rebid every year. Partner or founder dependence is the classic discount, because the asset that walks out the door was the thing being bought. Caveat: buyers reclassify “recurring” hard in diligence. Repeat is not recurring, and the multiple moves when that distinction lands.

Manufacturing

$3M to $10M EBITDA: 5.0x to 7.0x · Trend: Firming

Niche and precision manufacturers price on EV / LTM adjusted EBITDA: 5.0x to 7.0x at $3M to $10M of EBITDA and 6.5x to 8.5x above $10M, with automation-exposed industrial products modestly higher. GF Data recorded a 7.1x average for manufacturing deals in the first half of 2026, up from 6.7x in 2025. Proprietary processes, qualified-vendor status and aftermarket or consumables revenue earn premiums. EBITDA alone overstates debt capacity here: buyers underwrite EBITDA less maintenance capex, so capital intensity is priced even when the headline multiple looks healthy. Caveat: customer concentration above roughly 30% with a single OEM is the most common reason a manufacturing sale ends below the range.

Construction and home services

$3M to $10M EBITDA: 4.0x to 5.5x · Trend: Stable

These are two different markets sharing a jobsite. Commercial and specialty construction prices at 4.0x to 5.5x in the $3M to $10M EBITDA band, held back by project risk, bonding and cyclicality. Residential home services such as HVAC, plumbing and electrical price higher, 5.5x to 7.5x in the same band and 7.0x to 10.0x above $10M, because consolidators pay for service-agreement bases, route density and technician pipelines. Both price on EV / LTM adjusted EBITDA. Caveat: percentage-of-completion accounting and work-in-progress schedules get rebuilt in diligence, and a contractor’s reported EBITDA rarely survives a quality-of-earnings review unchanged.

Logistics and distribution

$3M to $10M EBITDA: 4.5x to 6.0x · Trend: Stable

Asset-light freight brokerage, 3PL and distribution businesses price on EV / LTM adjusted EBITDA: 4.5x to 6.0x for logistics and 5.0x to 6.5x for distributors in the $3M to $10M band. GF Data recorded a 6.0x average for distribution deals in the first half of 2026, the lowest of the sectors it reported. Asset intensity is the first sorting question: asset-heavy trucking prices below brokerage on the same earnings because the EBITDA is not comparable after maintenance capex. Distributors with exclusive lines and entrenched supplier relationships hold the top of the band. Caveat: freight-cycle earnings from 2024 and 2025 need careful normalization. Buyers will not pay a full multiple on cyclical peak EBITDA, and sellers who anchor to it stall their own sale.

Consumer and food

$3M to $10M EBITDA: 4.0x to 5.5x · Trend: Stable

Consumer products and e-commerce brands show the widest spread in the table: 4.0x to 5.5x at $3M to $10M of EBITDA, with channel-dependent marketplace brands below that and durable multi-channel brands above. Food and beverage manufacturing prices more like industrial companies, 5.0x to 7.0x in the same band, with co-manufacturers valued on contracts and capacity and branded producers on velocity and retailer relationships. All price on EV / LTM adjusted EBITDA. Caveat: tariff and supply-chain exposure is being underwritten explicitly in 2026, and import-dependent margin structures take the discount in the model, not in the narrative.

Calculator

How to calculate an EBITDA multiple and turn it into equity value

Enterprise value = LTM adjusted EBITDA × EV / EBITDA multiple

Equity value = enterprise value − funded debt − debt-like items + excess cash ± working-capital adjustment

Worked example. $3.0M of LTM adjusted EBITDA at 6.0x to 7.0x implies $18M to $21M of enterprise value. With $2.0M of funded debt and $0.5M of excess cash, equity value before other adjustments is $16.5M to $19.5M. Cash at closing can differ again because of working capital, debt-like items and net debt adjustments, earnouts, rollover equity, escrow, fees and taxes.

Where would your company trade?

Pick the industry and enter your figures. The band follows your EBITDA, and the result updates as you type. Nothing is sent anywhere unless you ask for a written read.

Your company

Indicative enterprise value

$21.0M to $30.0M

B2B SaaS (profitable), $3M to $10M EBITDA band

Multiple range
7.0x to 10.0x
Midpoint
$25.5M
Indicative equity value
$19.5M to $28.5M
Implied EV / revenue
1.4x to 2.0x

A competitive process with strong revenue quality aims for the top of the band; concentration, key-person risk or capital intensity pull toward the bottom. Public comparable: Software (System & Application) at 24.5x, for context only.

Want a second opinion on the number? Windsor Drake advises founder-led fintech, payments, software, cybersecurity and AI companies. If that is you, send these figures and an analyst will reply with a written read: where a buyer would most likely land inside the band, and the two or three factors most likely to move it. It is a read, not an appraisal, fairness opinion or offer.

Your figures go only to the Windsor Drake advisory team and are treated as confidential. Usually answered within two business days. By sending you accept our privacy policy.

Drivers

What moves the multiple: the Windsor Drake six-driver framework

Buyers do not price companies with adjustment grids, and neither does this page. Published “+0.5x for recurring revenue” tables double-count factors that interact and imply a precision the market does not offer. Each driver group below shifts the credible buyer pool and the risk case, and the interaction of all six, plus competition in the process, decides where inside or outside the band a company clears.

  1. Revenue quality

    Contractual recurrence, retention, pricing power and switching costs. The difference between contracted monthly recurring revenue and repeat project work is routinely worth more than any sector effect in the table.

  2. Growth and profitability

    Durable organic growth with defensible margins. Buyers pay for the trajectory they can underwrite and discount growth bought with unsustainable pricing or sales spend that masks churn.

  3. Concentration

    Customer, supplier, channel and contract concentration. A single relationship above roughly 25% to 30% of revenue moves financing terms, structure (earnouts, escrows) and price at the same time.

  4. Transferability

    Management depth below the owner, documented processes, systems and key-person risk. What survives the founder’s exit is what the buyer is paying for.

  5. Capital intensity

    Maintenance capex and working-capital absorption. Two companies with identical EBITDA and different capex profiles have different free cash flow, and buyers price cash flow.

  6. Transaction dynamics

    Buyer type (strategic or financial, platform or add-on), financing conditions and the competitiveness of the process itself. These decide which end of a range becomes real.

Limits

When an EBITDA multiple is the wrong tool

An EBITDA multiple assumes positive, normalized, cash-representative earnings and a buyer underwriting them. Several situations break that assumption.

  • Early-stage or negative-EBITDA SaaS. There is no earnings base to multiply. Buyers use ARR and revenue multiples with efficiency screens instead; see ARR multiple versus EBITDA multiple.
  • Banks, lenders and balance-sheet financials. Interest is the business, not a financing cost below the line. These price on earnings, book value and portfolio quality; EBITDA is close to meaningless.
  • Real-estate-heavy businesses and REITs. Value sits in the assets. Cap rates, FFO and appraisal methods govern, with the operating business valued separately from the property.
  • Owner-operated Main Street businesses. Below roughly $1M of earnings, SDE is the market’s metric because the buyer is buying a job plus a return, a different economic object.
  • Capital-intensive operations. EBITDA ignores the capex needed to keep revenue flat. Buyers shift to EBITDA less maintenance capex, or to EBIT, and so should the seller’s expectations.
  • Distressed or turnaround situations. With impaired earnings, value comes from assets, revenue or post-fix potential, priced through structure rather than a headline multiple.

Data providers

EBITDA multiples databases and providers, compared

A search for an EBITDA multiples provider usually means one of two things: a transaction database of closed private deals, or a public-market dataset that can be downloaded free. They answer different questions. This is the source map behind the table on this page, with the coverage each publisher states for itself.

EBITDA multiples data sources by type, coverage and access. Coverage as described by each publisher.
SourceWhat it coversAccessBest used for
GF DataCompleted private-equity-sponsored transactions in the US middle market, reported by contributing sponsors, with EV / EBITDA by size bandSubscription; headline averages published quarterlySponsor pricing at $10M to $500M of enterprise value
DealStats (Business Valuation Resources)Closed private and public-target transactions contributed by intermediaries and drawn from filings, with SDE and EBITDA multiplesSubscriptionMain Street and lower-middle-market comparables for appraisal work
IBBA and M&A Source Market PulseQuarterly survey of brokers and advisors on closed Main Street and lower-middle-market deals, with median multiples by deal sizeFree summary reportDirection of travel below $50M of enterprise value
Pepperdine Private Capital Markets ProjectAnnual survey of lenders, investors, brokers and appraisers on the cost of private capital and the multiples they reportFree annual reportCross-checking pricing by capital source
NYU Stern (Damodaran)Enterprise value multiples by sector for listed companies, updated each January, with US, European and emerging-market cutsFree downloadPublic EV / EBITDA by sector, including Europe and the UK
PitchBook, S&P Capital IQ, MergermarketPublic comps plus private transaction records with disclosed terms, screened by sector, size and geographyEnterprise subscriptionDeal-level precedent transactions inside a sale process
Equidam, Siblis Research, FinervaSector multiples derived from public-market data, grouped by TRBC or GICS industryFree or freemiumQuick public-market orientation, not private pricing

The ranges on this page combine the transaction sources above with Windsor Drake deal experience, and the public column is labelled as public. A provider that quotes one number for an industry with no size band and no deal count is giving orientation, not evidence. For Canada, the UK and Europe, use the Damodaran regional cut for public multiples and read the geography answer in the FAQ before applying US private ranges.

Public vs. private

Public comps versus private transaction pricing

Public-company EV / EBITDA data is a legitimate input and a terrible shortcut. NYU Stern’s January 2026 dataset puts US public companies at 19.7x EV / EBITDA across firms with positive EBITDA, with a wide sector spread: oil and gas production at 5.2x, telecom services at 6.5x, healthcare products at 19.8x and application and systems software at 24.5x. That aggregate is 2.8 times the 7.0x average GF Data recorded for middle-market private equity deals in Q2 2026. Those are trading multiples: minority-share prices for large, liquid, diversified companies with public reporting, not what a control buyer pays for a private company.

This page does not apply a blanket private-company discount to public multiples, because no defensible universal percentage exists. The honest method builds the private benchmark from private-market evidence, such as GF Data’s completed control deals, and treats public comps as context for sector sentiment and relative position. When you compare any two multiples, hold five distinctions straight: trading comps versus precedent control deals; announced versus closed deals; platform versus add-on pricing; strategic versus financial buyers; and LTM versus NTM earnings. Mixing any pair quietly changes the number by turns, not decimals.

Adjusted EBITDA

Normalizing adjusted EBITDA (and why “GAAP EBITDA” isn’t a thing)

EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP measures. No accounting standard defines them, which is exactly why the definition gets negotiated. The SEC’s non-GAAP guidance governs how public companies present such measures and reconcile them to GAAP results; in private deals the same discipline applies: every adjustment must reconcile to the financial statements and survive scrutiny.

Standard normalizations include above- or below-market owner compensation, personal expenses run through the business, one-time legal or transaction costs, non-recurring revenue or losses, rent adjusted to market for related-party real estate, and the pro forma effect of changes already made. Buyers accept adjustments they can verify and reject narratives. Before a sale, the credible move is a sell-side quality of earnings review and a defensible bridge showing how buyers normalize adjusted EBITDA line by line. The gap between reported EBITDA and a well-supported adjusted figure is often the cheapest EBITDA a seller will ever add, and an unsupported add-back list is the fastest way to lose pricing credibility in diligence.

Methodology

Methodology and source ledger

This section is the evidence contract for the page. Every number is observed (taken directly from a cited source), calculated (arithmetic on stated inputs) or Windsor Drake analyst judgment (an indicative range, not a computed statistic). The approach follows the logic of precedent transaction analysis: a benchmark is only as good as the universe behind it.

Sources
SourceWhat it suppliesAs of
GF Data via ACG, Q2 2026Average TEV / TTM adjusted EBITDA, 85 completed private equity dealsPublished August 27, 2026
ACG, GF Data first half 20267.1x on 170 deals; sector averages; platform and add-on pricingPublished October 1, 2026
GF Data small-deal analysisAverages by TEV bracket under $25M, 118 dealsH1 2025
GF Data size bandsAverages by deal size from $10M to $250M of TEVFirst nine months of 2025
BizBuySell Insight ReportMain Street closed sales, cash-flow and revenue multiples, median priceQ3 2026, published October 16, 2026
NYU Stern (Aswath Damodaran)US public EV / EBITDA and EV / EBIT by industryData as of January 2026
Windsor Drake25-industry ranges by EBITDA bandAnalyst judgment, August 2026
Geography and currency
United States and Canada; all figures in US dollars. NYU Stern covers US public companies, BizBuySell covers US Main Street sales and GF Data covers North American private equity deals.
Transaction status
GF Data figures are completed deals; BizBuySell figures are closed sales reported by brokers; NYU Stern figures are trading data, not transactions. Windsor Drake ranges are labeled judgment because they are not a closed-deal sample.
Period and earnings basis
Every EBITDA multiple on this page uses trailing (LTM or TTM) adjusted EBITDA unless a row says otherwise. No forward multiples are quoted. Each table states its source period.
Enterprise value and EBITDA scope
Enterprise value (TEV) is cash-free, debt-free total consideration. The main table uses EBITDA bands ($1M to $3M, $3M to $10M, $10M+); the size-effect table uses TEV brackets and says so. The two are never mixed.
Buyer and deal mix
GF Data reflects private equity platform and add-on deals by contributing sponsors. BizBuySell reflects Main Street sales, mostly to individual buyers. Windsor Drake ranges assume a competitive process with strategic and financial buyers; single-buyer negotiations routinely price below them.
Statistic definitions
Observed figures carry the statistic the source publishes (averages, aggregate ratios). Windsor Drake ranges are indicative ranges, not means, medians or interquartile ranges, and the page claims no percentile precision.
Samples
Sample sizes are shown wherever a source publishes them: 85 deals (GF Data, Q2 2026), 170 deals (H1 2026), 118 deals (H1 2025 small deals), 2,132 sales (BizBuySell, Q3 2026). No observation counts are claimed for judgment ranges.
Debt-like items
In the equity bridge, finance leases, earnouts owed, deferred compensation, unfunded liabilities, pending settlements, minority interests and pension obligations are treated as debt-like.
Known biases
GF Data is contributed by participating private equity firms, which biases it toward completed, sponsor-led deals. BizBuySell relies on voluntary broker reporting. Public-company data reflects survivorship.
Licensing
Public sources are cited with attribution and links. Windsor Drake ranges are free to use with attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Evidence ledger

Status of every value on this page
Value used on this pageStatusSource and period
7.0x average TEV / TTM adjusted EBITDA; 85 completed deals; standard $10M to $500M TEV cohortObservedGF Data via ACG, Q2 2026
7.1x on 170 deals; business services 7.5x, healthcare services 7.7x, manufacturing 7.1x, distribution 6.0x; add-ons 1.2x above platforms in Q2ObservedACG, first half 2026
2,132 closed sales; $350,000 median price; 3.73x cash flow and 0.97x revenue above $1M; 2.30x and 0.62x belowObservedBizBuySell Insight Report, Q3 2026
About 5.5x ($1M to $5M TEV), about 5.6x ($5M to $10M), 6.2x to 6.7x ($10M to $25M); 118 deals; a gap of “nearly a full turn”ObservedGF Data small-deal analysis, H1 2025
5.9x, 6.6x, 8.7x and 10.0x by deal size from $10M to $250M of TEVObservedGF Data, first nine months of 2025
19.7x EV / EBITDA, positive-EBITDA US firms; industry rows and examplesObservedNYU Stern (Damodaran), January 2026
All 25-industry band ranges and the range references in the industry notesAnalyst judgmentWindsor Drake, as of August 2026
Worked example ($18M to $21M EV; $16.5M to $19.5M equity) and all calculator outputsCalculatedArithmetic on stated inputs

Refresh schedule

Market data is refreshed when GF Data, BizBuySell or NYU Stern publish a new edition; NYU Stern updates each January. Ranges are reviewed twice a year. Next scheduled review: January 2027.

Version history

  1. Version 2026.10October 21, 2026Page redesigned. Market data updated: GF Data Q2 2026 (7.0x on 85 deals, previously Q1 2026 at 7.3x on 80) and first half 2026 (7.1x on 170, with sector averages); BizBuySell Q3 2026 (previously Q2 2026: 2.7x cash flow on 2,117 sales). Added a public comparable for each industry and the full NYU Stern January 2026 table in the page, and a working calculator. Confidence labels redefined: Moderate now marks the five technology sectors with dedicated Windsor Drake research, so eight other sectors moved from Moderate to Indicative. Analyst ranges unchanged from August 2026. New CSV and PDF editions; the earlier Q1 2026 PDF edition is superseded and its ranges should not be cited.
  2. Version 2026.08August 20, 2026Ranges reviewed; GF Data Q1 2026 and BizBuySell Q2 2026 added; interactive explorer added on September 22, 2026.
  3. Q1 2026 PDF editionBefore August 2026Reported different ranges and claimed interquartile transaction data. Superseded; do not cite.

FAQ

EBITDA multiple questions, answered directly

What is a good EBITDA multiple by industry?

One that clears the top of your sector-and-size band in a competitive process. As orientation: private equity deals in the middle market averaged 7.0x in Q2 2026 (GF Data, 85 deals), most lower-middle-market services sectors carry indicative ranges of roughly 4x to 7x, and premium recurring-revenue sectors reach 9x to 13x at $10M or more of EBITDA (Windsor Drake ranges). Good is relative to the right benchmark, never an absolute number.

How many times EBITDA is a business worth?

Most private companies with $1M to $10M of EBITDA sell for about 3x to 10x LTM adjusted EBITDA on an enterprise value basis, with sector, size and revenue quality setting the position in that span. Smaller Main Street businesses sell on a different metric: 2.30x to 3.73x average cash flow (SDE) in Q3 2026, depending on whether the sale price was under or over $1 million (BizBuySell).

Which industries receive the highest EBITDA multiples?

Sectors that combine recurring revenue, high margins and low capital intensity: profitable B2B SaaS, fintech and payments, healthcare IT, insurance brokerage and cybersecurity services, with indicative ranges of 8.5x to 13x at $10M or more of EBITDA (Windsor Drake ranges). Public markets show the same ordering: application and systems software at 24.5x EV / EBITDA against oil and gas production at 5.2x (NYU Stern, January 2026).

What is a reasonable EBITDA multiple for a small business?

Below roughly $1M of earnings, the market prices seller’s discretionary earnings rather than EBITDA: BizBuySell’s Q3 2026 data shows 2.30x cash flow for businesses that sold for under $1 million and 3.73x above it, across 2,132 closed sales. In the $1M to $3M EBITDA band, indicative enterprise value ranges run roughly 3x to 5.5x for most sectors (Windsor Drake). A reasonable figure is one benchmarked on the right earnings basis for the company’s size.

Why are small-business multiples lower?

Fewer credible buyers, less available financing, heavier key-person and customer concentration, and thinner management and systems. Each raises the buyer’s risk, and price compensates for risk. The effect is measurable: GF Data’s H1 2025 small-deal analysis shows deals under $10M of TEV near 5.5x to 5.6x against 6.2x to 6.7x for the $10M to $25M bracket, a persistent gap of nearly a full turn.

What is adjusted EBITDA?

Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, normalized to show the ongoing earning power of the business under new ownership: owner compensation reset to market, personal and one-time expenses removed, related-party rent adjusted and non-recurring items excluded. It is a non-GAAP measure, so the definition is negotiated in every deal, and every adjustment must reconcile to the financial statements to survive diligence.

What is the difference between SDE and EBITDA?

SDE adds the owner’s full compensation and benefits back to earnings, because a Main Street buyer replaces the owner and captures that pay. EBITDA charges a market salary for the management the business needs, because a financial or strategic buyer must hire it. The same company can show SDE far above its EBITDA, which is why a 3x SDE figure and a 6x EBITDA figure can describe similar economics.

How do I convert enterprise value to equity value?

Start with enterprise value, subtract funded debt and debt-like items (finance leases, earnouts owed, deferred compensation, unfunded liabilities), add excess cash, then apply the working-capital adjustment against the negotiated target. The result is indicative equity value. Cash actually received at closing differs again for escrow, rollover equity, transaction fees and taxes, so model those before accepting any headline number.

Should I use LTM or forward EBITDA?

Private company deals in this market price on trailing twelve-month (LTM or TTM) adjusted EBITDA. GF Data’s benchmarks are TTM-based, and this page follows that convention. Public comps are often quoted on forward estimates, which usually have a larger denominator and therefore a lower multiple. Never compare an LTM private multiple with a forward public one without saying so.

Are EBITDA multiples before or after debt?

Before. An EV / EBITDA multiple prices enterprise value, the whole capitalization, regardless of how the current owner financed it. Existing debt does not change enterprise value; it changes how that value splits between lenders and shareholders. Sellers receive equity value: enterprise value minus debt and debt-like items, plus excess cash, adjusted for working capital.

Can I use an EBITDA multiple if EBITDA is negative?

No: a negative base makes the arithmetic meaningless. If losses are temporary and well explained, buyers may underwrite a normalized or run-rate EBITDA, with proof. Otherwise the market switches metric: ARR or revenue multiples for recurring-revenue software, asset-based approaches for tangible-asset businesses, and structured deals (earnouts, contingent pricing) where value depends on a recovery a buyer will not prepay for.

Does a competitive sale process increase the multiple?

Competition is the mechanism that moves a company from the bottom of its credible range toward the top; a single negotiated buyer has no reason to pay a clearing price. No honest universal premium figure exists, and this page does not publish one: the effect depends on how many qualified buyers genuinely compete and how well the process holds that tension through diligence. It is one of the few drivers a seller fully controls.

What is the average EBITDA multiple by industry?

For private companies there is no single average per industry worth quoting, because size moves the number as much as sector does. In the $3M to $10M EBITDA band, Windsor Drake’s ranges run from 4.0x to 5.5x (construction, consumer products, staffing) up to 7.0x to 10.0x (B2B SaaS, fintech and payments). GF Data’s first-half 2026 sector averages for deals of $10M to $500M were 7.5x for business services, 7.7x for healthcare services, 7.1x for manufacturing and 6.0x for distribution. US public companies averaged 19.7x in aggregate (NYU Stern, January 2026).

What is the average EBITDA multiple for a small business?

Small businesses under roughly $1M of earnings are priced on SDE, not EBITDA: 2.30x average cash flow for businesses that sold for under $1 million in Q3 2026, and 3.73x for those that sold for more (BizBuySell). For small private equity deals, GF Data measured about 5.5x EBITDA for deals of $1M to $5M of enterprise value in the first half of 2025.

How much is a business worth with $1,000,000 in sales?

It depends on profit, not sales. Main Street businesses that sold for under $1 million averaged 0.62x revenue in Q3 2026 (BizBuySell), which puts $1,000,000 of sales near $620,000; the cash-flow method usually gives a tighter answer. A company with $1,000,000 of sales and $200,000 of seller’s discretionary earnings at the 2.30x average cash-flow multiple would be worth about $460,000. A highly profitable, recurring business can be worth well above both.

What does a 10x EBITDA multiple mean?

The buyer pays enterprise value equal to ten years of current EBITDA: $2M of EBITDA at 10x is $20M of enterprise value, before debt and cash. Put the other way, the buyer accepts a 10% pre-tax EBITDA yield because it expects growth or synergies. In private markets, 10x is the top of the range for premium recurring-revenue sectors such as B2B SaaS and fintech at $3M to $10M of EBITDA, and inside the range at $10M or more.

What is a typical EBITDA multiple for a service business with under $10 million in revenue?

A service business with under $10M of revenue usually earns under $2M of EBITDA, which puts it in the $1M to $3M band: about 4.0x to 5.5x for business and professional services, 4.5x to 6.0x for IT services and MSPs, and 3.5x to 5.0x for accounting firms and marketing agencies (Windsor Drake ranges). Below roughly $1M of earnings, buyers price SDE instead, at 2.30x to 3.73x in Q3 2026 (BizBuySell).

What EBITDA multiple will private equity pay for my company?

Private equity deals in GF Data’s $10M to $500M cohort averaged 7.0x TTM adjusted EBITDA in Q2 2026 across 85 completed deals, and 7.1x for the first half of the year. Smaller deals priced lower: about 5.5x to 5.6x under $10M of enterprise value in the first half of 2025. In the second quarter of 2026, add-on acquisitions priced 1.2x above platform deals, so a company that fits an existing platform can command more.

How do you calculate an EBITDA multiple for a private company?

Divide enterprise value by LTM adjusted EBITDA. To estimate value, run it the other way: normalize EBITDA (owner pay to market, one-time costs out), choose the band for the company’s industry and EBITDA size, multiply, then bridge to equity by subtracting debt and debt-like items and adding excess cash. The calculator on this page does each step.

Do these EBITDA multiples apply in Canada, the UK or Europe?

The ranges cover private companies in the United States and Canada, in US dollars. GF Data covers North American private equity deals and the NYU Stern table covers US listed companies. For the UK and continental Europe, use local deal data: financing markets, buyer pools and deal structures differ. NYU Stern publishes separate regional datasets for public companies.

Which EBITDA multiples database should I use?

Match the database to the deal size and the question. For sponsor-backed deals of roughly $10M to $500M of enterprise value, GF Data and the subscription deal databases (PitchBook, S&P Capital IQ, Mergermarket) hold the transaction-level evidence. Below that, DealStats and the IBBA and M&A Source Market Pulse survey cover Main Street and lower-middle-market closings. Public-company sector multiples from NYU Stern are free and useful for orientation, not for pricing a private company. The data providers table on this page sets out the coverage and access model of each.

Where can I download EBITDA multiples by industry as a PDF or CSV?

In the download section of this page: the CSV has every range with its provenance fields, and the PDF reproduces the table with sources. Both are version 2026.10 and free to use with attribution. The earlier Q1 2026 PDF edition is superseded.

Related terms this page deliberately does not cover

EBITDA margin by industry measures profitability, EBITDA as a percentage of revenue, not valuation, and benchmarking it is a different exercise. For what counts as a strong margin profile, see how much EBITDA is good.

Rule of 40 is a SaaS efficiency screen (growth rate plus profit margin of 40 or more), not a valuation multiple. Where it meets pricing, the mechanics are in ARR multiple versus EBITDA multiple.

Download

Download the data

The HTML table above is the canonical version; the files mirror it. Free to use with attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Files, version 2026.10

Dataset (CSV)

25 industries, three bands, primary metric, trend, drivers, public comparable and provenance fields.

Report (PDF)

The table, market tiers, size effect and sources on four pages.

Cite this dataset

Windsor Drake (2026). “EBITDA Multiples by Industry: 2026 Private-Company Ranges.” Version 2026.10, October 21, 2026. https://windsordrake.com/ebitda-multiples-by-industry/

Data dictionary (CSV columns)

CSV columns
ColumnMeaning
industry, anchorSector name and its stable jump-link ID on this page.
b1_low_x, b1_high_x, b2_low_x, b2_high_x, b3_low_x, b3_high_xLow and high ends of the indicative EV / LTM adjusted EBITDA range for each EBITDA band ($1M to $3M, $3M to $10M, $10M+), as multiples.
primary_metricThe metric that governs pricing in the sector, including alternatives (ARR, SDE) where EBITDA stops applying.
trend_2026Direction against 2025 (Firming, Stable, Softening). Analyst judgment, not a computed statistic.
key_driversTop three premium and discount drivers, separated by semicolons.
public_comparable, public_ev_ebitdaClosest NYU Stern industry and its EV / EBITDA, January 2026, positive-EBITDA firms; blank where no close match exists.
confidence, statistic, basisModerate or Indicative; “indicative range”; “Windsor Drake analyst judgment”. No row is a mean, median or interquartile range.
geography, currency, earnings_basis, value_basis, ranges_as_of, versionUS and Canada; USD; LTM adjusted EBITDA; enterprise value (cash-free, debt-free); August 2026; 2026.10.

Where would your company actually price?

Benchmarks frame the conversation; a real answer needs your revenue quality, concentration, transferability and buyer map. Windsor Drake runs confidential, competitive sale processes for founder-led fintech, payments, software, cybersecurity and AI companies.

Research, not investment advice, a fairness opinion or a valuation of any specific company. Third-party data is cited to its source and remains its owner’s.